场景介绍
在问答这个大场景下，还有一个子场景是推理，这个场景非常有意思，而且是个非常值得深挖的场景，prompt 在此场景里发挥的作用非常大。
如果你想用 ChatGPT API 做点什么小应用，我建议可以从这个场景入手，相对来说没有其他场景那么红海。
举个比较简单的例子，我将美国工商管理硕士的入学考试 GMAT 的一道数学题输入进了 ChatGPT：
If a real estate agent received a commission of 6 percent of the selling price of a certain house, what was the selling price of the house? | |
| (1) The selling price minus the real estate agent’s commission was $84,600. | |
| (2) The selling price was 250 percent of the original purchase price of $36,000. | |
| (A) Statement (1) ALONE is sufficient, but statement (2) alone is not sufficient. | |
| (B) Statement (2) ALONE is sufficient, but statement (1) alone is not sufficient. | |
| (C) BOTH statements TOGETHER are sufficient, but NEITHER statement ALONE is sufficient. | |
| (D) EACH statement ALONE is sufficient. | |
| (E) Statements (1) and (2) TOGETHER are NOT sufficient. | |
这道题目的中文意思是这样的（你不妨也思考下这个题目？）：
如果一个房地产经纪人的佣金是某个房子的售价的6％，那么这个房子的售价是多少？ | |
| （1）售价减去房地产经纪人的佣金为84,600美元。 | |
| （2）购买价是36,000美元，售价是购买价的250%。 | |
| （A）仅陈述（1）足以回答问题，但仅陈述（2）不能回答问题。 | |
| （B）仅陈述（2）足以回答问题，但仅陈述（1）不能回答问题。 | |
| （C）两个陈述合起来足以回答问题，但没有一个陈述单独足以回答问题。 | |
| （D）每个陈述单独足以回答问题。 | |
| （E）陈述（1）和（2）合起来不能回答问题。 | |
它的 Output 是这样的，它会根据题目的要求去推理和运算：
Let's assume the selling price of the house is S. | |
| According to the given information, the real estate agent's commission is 6% of S, which is 0.06S. | |
| So, the amount received by the seller after paying the commission would be (S - 0.06S) = 0.94S. | |
| Statement (1) tells us that 0.94S = $84,600. Solving for S, we get S = $90,000. | |
| Therefore, statement (1) alone is sufficient to determine the selling price of the house. | |
| Statement (2) tells us that the selling price is 250% of the original purchase price, which means S = 2.5*$36,000 = $90,000. | |
| Therefore, statement (2) alone is also sufficient to determine the selling price of the house. | |
| Since both statements individually provide the same answer, we can conclude that together they are also sufficient to determine the selling price of the house. | |
| Hence, the answer is (D) EACH statement ALONE is sufficient. | |
翻译成中文是这样的：
假设房子的售价为S。 | |
| 根据所给信息，房地产经纪人的佣金是S的6％，即0.06S。 | |
| 因此，在支付佣金后卖方收到的金额为（S-0.06S）= 0.94S。 | |
| 陈述（1）告诉我们，0.94S = 84,600美元。解出S，我们得到S = $90,000。 | |
| 因此，陈述（1）单独足以确定房子的售价。 | |
| 陈述（2）告诉我们，售价是原始购买价的250％，这意味着S = 2.5 * $36,000 = $90,000。 | |
| 因此，陈述（2）单独也足以确定房子的售价。 | |
| 由于两个陈述分别提供相同的答案，我们可以得出结论，它们共同足以确定房子的售价。 | |
| 因此，答案是（D）每个陈述单独足以回答问题。 | |
这个场景还比较简单，我就不在这举更多例子了，你可以将各种题目输入进 ChatGPT 里试试。
正文完